How major KYC platforms structure pricing.
Neutral, descriptive, non-comparative. Four common pricing structures, published per-check anchors, enterprise-tier benchmarks, volume-discount mechanics, and what sits outside the platform line. Built for an RFP, not a vendor pitch.
Per-verification: $0.10 - $2.00 | Platform plans: from $149/mo | Enterprise: $50k - $250k+ annually
The four common pricing structures.
Per-verification with monthly minimum
Sumsub on the Network plan, Veriff on smaller-scale plans. Predictable per-check commercials, monthly minimum buys access to the platform. Suits firms where verification volume is the dominant cost driver.
Tiered platform plans
ComplyCube, Persona Plus, Sumsub Starter and Pro plans. Bundled feature scope at price points; verification volume often included up to a tier ceiling. Suits firms where feature scope (orchestration, EDD module, case management) matters more than per-check commercials.
Enterprise custom annual
Onfido, Jumio, Trulioo, Persona Enterprise. Annual contracts beginning $50,000-$200,000 with custom builds beyond. Volume-committed pricing 30-60% below published per-check rates. Suits scale fintechs onboarding 100k+ customers a year.
Hybrid platform + per-check
Most vendors at scale. Annual platform commitment plus committed-use per-verification rate. The most common large-fintech configuration. Suits procurement teams that need both predictability and unit-cost transparency.
Published commercials.
| Vendor | Pricing structure | Anchor commercials | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sumsub | Per-verification + monthly minimum | $1.35 reusable verification, plans from $149/mo | sumsub.com/pricing 2025 |
| ComplyCube | Tiered platform plans + per-check | $0.10 - $1.50 ID document, $0.25 - $2.00 biometric | complycube.com 2025 |
| Veriff | Per-check, volume-discounted | From $0.80 per check, enterprise on application | veriff.com 2025 |
| Onfido | Enterprise custom contracts | Annual contracts typically $50k - $200k+ | Industry RFP benchmarks 2025 |
| Jumio | Enterprise custom contracts | Annual contracts typically $50k - $250k+ | Industry RFP benchmarks 2025 |
| Trulioo | Enterprise custom + per-call API | Custom; per-API-call commercials at scale | trulioo.com 2025 |
| Persona | Tiered platform + per-verification | Plus and Premium tiers; enterprise on application | withpersona.com 2025 |
Vendor names appear here in descriptive context only. This site does not rank or recommend platforms. Contracts are negotiated; published commercials are the floor reference, not the typical engagement price.
Enterprise-tier reality.
For Onfido, Jumio, Trulioo, Persona Enterprise, and Sumsub at upper-tier scale, annual contracts begin at $50,000-$200,000 and run materially higher for multi-jurisdictional or multi-product builds. The contract buys a committed-use level; per-verification commercials within the commit are typically 30-60% below published rates. The break-even point at which the committed contract beats pay-as-you-go commercials usually falls around 50,000-100,000 verifications a year on a single product line.
The published vendor pricing pages on the open web are pitched at startups and SMEs. Scale fintechs almost always negotiate; the asymmetry between published and contracted commercials is one of the larger cost-control levers in compliance procurement. RFP discipline at the £100,000+ vendor-spend mark routinely returns 20-40% off published rates.
Volume-discount mechanics.
Step-tier and committed-use discounting compound. The procurement implication is concrete: an RFP that decomposes pricing into platform fee, committed-use floor, per-verification rate above commit, and per-feature (sanctions data, EDD module, ongoing monitoring) line items will surface 15-30% of cost that a bundled quote routinely hides.
What sits outside the platform price.
Sanctions / PEP / adverse media data feeds
Often a separate provider (LSEG World-Check, Dow Jones, ComplyAdvantage). See sanctions-screening cost page.
Ongoing monitoring add-ons
Continuous screening, transaction monitoring integration, perpetual KYC orchestration.
EDD module
Source-of-funds workflow, UBO mapping, senior approval queue. Often gated to higher tiers.
Document translation
Cross-border UBO chains; per-page commercials with multi-language vendors.
Fraud-signal API
Behavioural / device fingerprint signals layered on the verification. Optional but increasingly common.
Integration / SI cost
One-off systems-integrator cost. Lower at lower complexity; higher for multi-product, multi-jurisdictional builds.
For a mid-sized fintech, these lines together typically add 40-80% on top of the headline platform price. Surfacing them in the RFP is the difference between a defensible budget and a budget that overruns mid-year. The RegTech cost page maps where each line sits in the broader compliance stack.
The build crossover signal.
Above roughly 250,000-500,000 onboardings a year, the buy TCO crosses the build TCO for a single-jurisdiction fintech. Below that, buy almost always wins. The realistic answer for most scale fintechs is hybrid: buy identity verification, buy sanctions data, build workflow plus decisioning plus case management. See the build vs buy page for the full crossover analysis.
Provider pricing questions
How is KYC API pricing structured?+
What does Sumsub cost per check?+
Is there a transparent KYC vendor on the market?+
How does enterprise tier pricing work?+
What sits outside the platform price?+
When should a fintech move from buy to build?+
Sources cited on this page
- Sumsub published platform pricing
- ComplyCube published platform pricing
- Veriff published platform pricing
- Onfido pricing context (industry RFP benchmarks 2025)
- Jumio pricing context (industry RFP benchmarks 2025)
- Persona pricing
- Trulioo pricing